My Thoughts on Akira Kurosawa’s Ikiru

After seeing Living last year, which was one of my favourite films of 2022, I really wanted to check out the film it was based on, Ikiru by Akira Kurosawa. What I wasn’t expecting was how close the adaptation actually is. I want to make it clear that I watched Ikiru second, because I think seeing Living first changed the way I experienced Ikiru, simply because they’re so similar. They’re both incredibly well made films, with great performances, and both make you think about life and reflect on what you find important. It’s inspiring and life affirming. There’s definitely some differences, but the main themes and story moments are the same.

Kanji Watanabe (Takashi Shimura) finds out that he has terminal stomach cancer and starts to look at his life and the path it’s taken. He’s spent thirty years in a dead-end bureaucratic job at city hall that has sucked out all of his passion out of his job and life in general. There’s a really telling moment at the beginning as he opens his desk drawer, which reveals a document that he submitted decades earlier where he suggested ways to make the department more efficient, which was rejected. After he gets his diagnosis, he stops going to work and starts to try and find a way to live life to the fullest, except he doesn’t know how.

Ikiru is a really sombre and slow film, that takes it time and really shows how Watanabe reflects on his life and the time he has left. At first he tries to tell his family, but he can’t. He’s so distraught by what he’s been told that he doesn’t even turn the light on when he gets home. He’s fully aware that life has passed him by and that he’s been acting almost as if he’s been dead for a long time, like a walking mummy. He sits in the darkness and waits for his son, and daughter-in-law, to return home, and when they do they discuss him while walking through the house thinking that he isn’t there. They want to get to his savings and his pension before he dies, and when they turn the light on to find him there, there’s not even a hint of an apology or any concern towards him. He leaves the room and mourns the loss of his wife in silence while they continue their evening. Watanabe’s wife died years earlier, when their son was still little, since then he’s put his own life aside to make sure that his son is looked after, and now that he’s older there’s no appreciation of that.

At one point, in one of the saddest moments of the film, Watanabe’s son shouts downstairs to him, and he gets up and immediately goes to his son, desperately looking for human connection. Instead, his son just asks him to lock up downstairs since they’re going to bed. The look on Watanabe’s face is heart-breaking, as he’s shut out from having that connection to his son that he needs at that moment. Takashi Shimura, who appeared in twenty-one of Akira Kurosawa’s films, is simply brilliant in this film. His quiet performance is incredibly moving and emotional.

When he’s unable to connect with his family, and not wanting to return to work, Watanabe looks for other ways to start living. He goes out on an all night drinking session, which has highs and lows. He also becomes friends with a younger co-worker, who shows him how to find joy in the little moments in life, even if he doesn’t quite understand it at first. She teaches him that creating something brings joy to her life, so he tries to bring joy to others.

The film starts with a really light-hearted tone as a narrator introduces us to our protagonist and bluntly explains how he hasn’t been living and is soon going to find out that he’s closer to the end of his life than he’d realised. It’s almost comical and the film in general does have a sense of humour, although it’s not a comedy by any stretch. It also has an unconventional structure. A little over halfway through Watanabe dies, and the rest of the film is told through flashbacks as his co-workers and family discuss how he changed over the last few months of his life, and couldn’t work out if he knew he was going to die or not. This sequence has a very poignant message where the characters discuss that they would also change if they knew they were going to die, and when someone points out that they could die at any moment they initially dismiss it. Then as that reality sinks in they promise that they will change the way they live, but ultimately don’t follow through with that and the routine returns.

Overall, I think both of Ikiru and Living are brilliant. For me, Living had a bigger impact on me that Ikiru but that’s simply because I watched that one first and they’re both similar. I would recommend watching either and if you liked one, you’ll probably like the other. There’s enough subtle differences to make them both worth watching in their own right.

Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed my post, please subscribe to never miss another one:

Posted in film reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mid-January Update

Hello everyone,

As promised, it’s the 15th, so I’m writing a little update post about how everything’s been going. First things, first: writing. I’ve been writing pretty consistently this month. I think I’ve written around 10,000 words of fiction since the 1st. I should have made a note of how many words each day. It would have been really good to see how many words I had written by the end of the year, but alas that idea didn’t come until the year had already started. Maybe next year. I’ve been writing both Magic in London and Once which are both going well.

I’m currently at 39,000 words on Once and heading into the final part of the story. I really don’t like that title, it was just something to name the word file, so I will probably have changed it 6 times before anyone reads a word of it. Still, I’m really happy with how it’s going. I think it’s the best thing I’ve ever written and I’m very nervous to let people read it. Unlike most things I write, it’s not horror or fantasy. It’s a completely grounded story about a writer who’s nearing the end of his twenties and travels to London to see some friends who he hasn’t seen in a few years. It’s also different as it’s the easiest thing I’ve ever written. It feels very natural.

Magic in London started as a writing exercise just to get something written when I had half an hour free one evening. I didn’t really intend anything to come from it, but as I was nearing the end of what I was writing a story started to unfold in my mind. I don’t really know where it’s going, but I do have some plot points in my head that are constantly shifting. I’m hoping to publish one part of it every Friday for at least the whole of 2023. Each part will be around 1000 – 1500 words each. If you haven’t already, please check it out. You can find the first part here: https://ashleymanning.com/2022/12/23/magic-in-london-whistling/ I would really appreciate any feedback you have about it. Good or bad.

With reading, I’m well on my way for finishing 4 books in January. I’ve read two and an about a third of the way through the third one. I’ll write more about that on the 1st Feb, along with what I plan on reading in February.

The other thing I wanted to write about today was going to see the musical George Takei’s Allegiance yesterday in London. Tabby and I saw George Takei talking about the musical while we were at Wales Comic Con last year, and Tabby said instantly that she wanted to go. So that was her Christmas present sorted. The musical is inspired by the internment camps that Japanese Americans were placed in after Pearl Harbour during WW2. It’s a really dark piece of American history. George Takei spent his childhood in one of the camps, and he’s spent a lot of time bringing awareness to what happened, and the musical is another part of that. The story is fictional, but it’s inspired by true events. It’s definitely strange to tell such a dark and sad story as a musical, but it does really work. It’s just as uplifting as it is sad and I did enjoy it a lot.

We saw it at the Charring Cross Theatre, which has a unique set up. The stage is in the middle and the audience is on either side of the stage, and no matter where you’re sitting you get a really great view of what’s going on and the production makes really good use of the box like stage. It’s a full on musical with big numbers and dance sequences. There’s funny parts and darker moments. Tabby cried a lot during it, as did some of the others in the audience. It’s really about how this tragic event caused tensions and division in families and how the effects of the camp were felt long after they were shut down. Definitely a memorable trip to the theatre.

After the show, George Takei and co-star Telly Leung stayed around to sign things and take photos with fans, which I was quite surprised about because it was a matinee performance and there was another one later the same day. We met them both, and they were really nice and then went on our way to get some food and head back home.

I hope everyone’s 2023 has been going well so far and I’ll catch you all again in the next update in mid-February.

Thanks for reading!

Posted in Uncategorized, Updates | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

M3gan โ€“ Film Review

Director: Gerard Johnstone

Writer: Akela Cooper

Starring: Allison Williams, Jenna Davis, Amie Donald, and Violet McGraw

Rating: โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…ยฝ

M3gan is a great comedy horror film, directed by Gerard Johnstone (Housebound). The script was written by Akela Cooper, and the story was from Cooper and James Wan (both had also worked together previously on the brilliant Malignant from 2021). The film revolves around M3gan (Amie Donald and voiced by Jenna Davis), a doll that Gemma (Allison Williams) creates to give her niece, Cady (Violet McGraw), after her parents are killed in a car accident. M3ganโ€™s development is rushed, and with other deadlines closing in at work, an unfinished M3gan is put forward. All of that causes M3gan to become fully sentient and she’ll stop at nothing to keep Cady happy.

The M3gan doll is genuinely really creepy. Itโ€™s easy to see why people would be amazed with her at first, but you definitely wouldnโ€™t want one in your house for long. She adapts really quickly to her surroundings and is always listening to whatโ€™s going on around. Sheโ€™s incredibly protective of Cady, taking her mission to keep her safe to the extreme. She pops up all over the place, making Gemma aware that she doesnโ€™t completely trust her. Itโ€™s unnerving, and thatโ€™s before you get to her killing people.

Mixed in with the horror is a good sense of humour. There are some silly moments, especially in the adverts at the beginning of the film, and some funny satirical moments around how dependent people are on their phones, and technology in general. Itโ€™s all too plausible that a robot designed to be a toy, could eventually essentially replace parents. Some of the funniest moments come from when the side-characters are on screen. Thereโ€™s a detective who starts to connect some dots, that shows no empathy to a dead child. Gemmaโ€™s neighbour, Celia, played by Lori Dungey is also funny in the few scenes that sheโ€™s in.  

On top of the comedy thereโ€™s also some brief moments that deal with grief as Cady confides in M3gan about how sheโ€™s feeling about the loss of her parents, in a scene thatโ€™s both chilling in how advance M3gan has become in such a short time, as well as a great reflection on Cadyโ€™s life and why sheโ€™s so quick to connect with M3gan. Itโ€™s a great scene  

The only real drawback on the film is when it gets to the kill scenes, thereโ€™s not a lot shown. There are a few grizzly bits of gore, with a really graphic moment involving an ear, but the camera always pans away or cuts before you see that much. Once that pattern sets in, thereโ€™s not a lot of tension in the actual deaths, since you know youโ€™re not going to see it. Itโ€™s a shame that the film is so tame in its violence because it really stops M3gan from being as scary and tense as possible. Most of the terror comes from the jump scares, most of which involve the next-door neighbourโ€™s dog, and thatโ€™s a shame.

Even so, M3gan is a really fun film. It blends horror and comedy together really nicely, and itโ€™s definitely funnier than it is scary. The character of M3gan is already becoming iconic and that will only grow in time with the inevitable sequels. The film is funny, and just an all-round good time. Definitely a good start to 2023.

Thanks for reading! If you liked my review, please subscribe to never miss a post:

Posted in film reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Magic in London – Whistling – Part Four

Catch up on the Magic in London Story here: https://ashleymanning.com/magic-in-london/


Once Chuck and Fiona reached the old station, Chuck started to feel that there was a lightness to the air. Along the way heโ€™d learnt that the boyโ€™s name was Toby, who was still being carried by Fiona, completely out cold.

โ€œThis way,โ€ Fiona said, while leading Chuck towards a door that was sitting against the wall on the tracks, just before the actual platform. Chuck almost didnโ€™t see the door, it was blended into the wall almost completely, but once he focused his eyes it was as clear as day.

โ€œWhere are we going?โ€ Chuck asked.

โ€œDonโ€™t ask questions that you already know the answer to. Through this door is a portway to Whistling. Thatโ€™s all you need to know.โ€

โ€œWhat was that thing?โ€

โ€œEnough, can you hold him please?โ€

Fiona handed Toby over to Chuck. He struggled to hold the boy in his arms. Fiona moved over to the door and started to feel around the edges to get her fingers between the door and the frame. It was shimmering light as she touched it.

โ€œIs this door a trick?โ€ Chuck asked.

โ€œWhat?โ€

โ€œIs it not visible to others, I mean. Itโ€™s shining every time you touch it. Thatโ€™s not normal.โ€

โ€œItโ€™s a weak spot so the door is there but only certain people can see it,โ€ she continued speaking while trying to shimmy the door open. โ€œItโ€™s really stuck today. Arthur placed it here back when the station was still in use. Then the station was abandoned and it kind of works better now than it did before. Since itโ€™s completely isolatedโ€

โ€œRight. So there are other doors then?โ€

โ€œYeah, in quite a few stations. They all lead to Whistling though. Itโ€™s not just this one that does. Thereโ€™s one at Euston, Buckhurst Hill, Croxley, and Wood Green. And obviously thereโ€™s this one, but itโ€™s not used as much.โ€

โ€œRight, but how is it stuck if itโ€™s a magic door?โ€

Fiona stopped trying to pry the door open with her fingers and turned to Chuck with a serious look on her face.

โ€œBecause itโ€™s still a door, you idiot. It hasnโ€™t been used in a few months at least and itโ€™s always been a little hard to open because itโ€™s the oldest one. The door is real,โ€ she said knocking it and the echoing sound of metal rumbled throughout the tunnel. โ€œIt just sits on a piece of this world that is weaker.โ€

โ€œWhat does that mean?โ€ Chuck said with a desperation that he would later cringe about. The whole thing made no sense to him, and he was still hoping that he could just leave and forget about it all.

โ€œStop it with the questions. Youโ€™ll understand when you understand, Iโ€™m not your babysitter.โ€

Fiona turned back to the door and continued to pry the door open. It screeched, scraped, and churned as she pulled it free. A cold gust of air moved through the dark doorway and brushed past Chuck and Fiona.

โ€œJesus, thatโ€™s cold,โ€ Chuck said.

โ€œYeah, itโ€™s the atmosphere from the other world moving into this one. Itโ€™ll settle in a moment once they level out.โ€

โ€œIโ€™ll just pretend that makes sense.โ€

โ€œIโ€™m beginning to regret bringing you here, if I wasnโ€™t so sure that Arthur would be interested in meeting you, then I would just let you wonder the tracks by yourself until you become tomorrow morningโ€™s headline.โ€

Chuck gulped at her words and tried to stay quiet. Through the doorway all he could see was darkness. It seemed to lead to absolutely nothing. Once the air settled, Fiona pulled out her knife again and held it forward and whistled a high-pitched and long whistle. Out of the end of her knife jumped a long snake of fire that moved through the doorway, it jumped across and lit up a cave ceiling. With each jump it made, it also left behind a floating orb of fire that made a lighted path through the tunnel. Chuck watched, and almost dropped Toby, as the fire jumped itโ€™s way through a passageway.

โ€œFollow me,โ€ Fiona said. โ€œItโ€™s not that far once we get going.โ€

She stepped through the doorway and took a few more steps. Chuck followed, his liquidised feet shaking with every step. As he walked through the doorway, Fiona took Toby back, and started to walk ahead. The walls were slimy and wet, the sound of dripping water the only sound beyond the slight noise the fire was making. Fiona walked ahead and started to follow the tunnels, following the pathway lit by the balls of fire that were still suspended in the air. As they reached the first twist, Chuck realised that there were other pathways they could be taking.

โ€œWhatโ€™s down there,โ€ he asked, forgetting about her warning about not speaking.

โ€œOther stations. They all meet along in this tunnel and then we reach Whistling.โ€

โ€œWhat is this place? I donโ€™t like it.โ€

โ€œDonโ€™t be so pathetic. This is Whistling Academy. Arthur built it. He created this entire world that youโ€™re standing, just over a hundred years ago. Itโ€™s just out of sync with the normal world to keep the students safe. And to answer your question back there, that spider shadow, it was created by Toby. Not on purpose, but by accident out of fear. We only enrolled him in the academy last week, and heโ€™s understandably scared, but we donโ€™t have much of a choice. You saw what he created, I had to shield the rest of the world from that thing so they couldnโ€™t see it. Thatโ€™s why we didnโ€™t just fight in the street. He conjured it from nothing as a pure mistake. Now heโ€™s exhausted, again understandably.โ€

โ€œWhy is he so scared? Is his family not with him? Are they not magical as well?โ€

โ€œNo, theyโ€™re not with him. And no, theyโ€™re not whistlers either. When we find someone who starts to show that he might be capable, we take them here to stop them from causing destruction to the rest of the world and to keep their abilities a secret. We have to take them and we canโ€™t explain it to the parents so they donโ€™t come looking for them or telling others.โ€

โ€œHow do you do that then? Just kidnap a child.โ€

โ€œItโ€™s not much further to go now, weโ€™ll be there in a moment.โ€

Chuck took that as his que to shut up and carry on following Fiona. There was a brief moment, as they passed another passageway that branched of, where he thought about making a run for it and breaking through whatever door was at the end of it, and then finding a way back home, but the darkness of the other tunnels wasnโ€™t inviting enough, and soon enough they reached a clearing. The cave lead out into a forest, where bare trees reached up to a star filled sky, and the there was a natural light coming from somewhere that gave everything a warm glow.

โ€œArenโ€™t we underground?โ€ Chuck asked.

โ€œNo, weโ€™re in another world. Iโ€™ve already said that.โ€

The tunnel exit led straight to a path that weaved through the trees. They followed it and as the trees started to thin out, something much more impressive came into view. There was a clearing in front of them, that lead to a hill and on that hill was an old manor house and a stone staircase leading up towards it. The whole thing looks majestic and old, even if it was in a state of disrepair it was a marvel to look at. Through a series of windows, light was emanating. Tall chimney stacks were bellowing out smoke into the endless sky.

โ€œWhoa,โ€ Chuck said.

To the right and left the sky reached downwards and wrapped itself around the world, making a pocked around the building and trees. It made Chuck feel dizzy to look at it, and it reminded him of something from a video game he used to play and that was the boundaries to the level he was on.

โ€œItโ€™s a small bubble world, just the Academy and some trees for practice. Thatโ€™s all that exists here. Then it just stretches out into nothingness. Youโ€™ll see the edge one day, Iโ€™m sure. Arthur likes to show people the limits of the world heโ€™s created.โ€

Fiona walked forward, through the clearing and towards the stairs that lead to Whistling Academy, and Chuck followed closely behind.

To be continued…

Thanks for reading! Part Five: https://ashleymanning.com/2023/01/20/magic-in-london-whistling-part-five/

Donโ€™t forget to subscribe:

Posted in Short Stories | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Strangers on a Train โ€“ Film Review

Director: Alfred Hitchcock

Writers: Raymond Chandler, Whitfield Cook, and Czenzi Ormonde

Starring: Farley Granger, Ruth Roman, Robert Walker, and Leo G. Carroll

Alfred Hitchcockโ€™s 1951 film Strangers on a Train is an adaptation of Patricia Highsmithโ€™s first novel of the same name. Even though the film is now considered an all time classic, at the time it received a more mixed reception. Before you even get to the film, the production was also filled with drama from the start. After Hitchcock had a treatment for the story written by Whitfield Cook, but he couldnโ€™t find a writer to turn it into a script. Legendary detective writer Raymond Chandler was eventually brought on board, but he didnโ€™t get on with Hitchcock at all and was eventually replaced by Czenzi Ormonde. Not wanting to lose Chandlerโ€™s name the studio insisted that he still received credit, even though the script was reworked from scratch again by Ormonde and both Chandler and Hitchcock agreed he shouldn’t be credited.

The plot revolves around Guy Haines (Farley Granger) who meets Bruno Antony (Robert Walker) while on a train and ends up stuck in a conversation with him that starts to destroy his life. Bruno points out that they both have someone they want to get rid of, he wants to be rid of his father, while Guy wants out of his marriage. He proposes that they kill the other personโ€™s person. He will kill Guyโ€™s wife and in return Guy will kill his father. Guy doesnโ€™t take him seriously and goes about his life, not thinking anything of it. Bruno has other ideas and kills Guyโ€™s wife, Miriam, and expects Guy to fulfil his side of the so-called agreement.

The two lead roles are perfectly cast, which makes the film brilliant. Robert Walker, who sadly died shortly after the film finished production, is phenomenal as Bruno Antony. Heโ€™s a complete psychopath who worms his way into a conversation with Guy. Likewise, Farley Granger makes Guy feel real and completely believable that heโ€™s too polite not to just tell Bruno to leave when the he first starts speaking to him. You can tell that heโ€™s uncomfortable but Bruno has control of the situation, he wonโ€™t let him leave the conversation and pressures him until he draws him into his plan and the plot is in motion. Thereโ€™s a really interesting power dynamic between the two characters, and thatโ€™s completely what makes the film work. As the story progresses the scales start to balance themselves out until Bruno isnโ€™t completely in control.

Even over seventy years after the film was first released, itโ€™s still one of the most visually stunning films ever. The film is the first collaboration between Hitchcock and cinematographer Robert Burks. Later the pair would work together on twelve films. Burks style complements Hitchcockโ€™s stories perfectly. Straight from the opening scene, showing Guy and Bruno walking to get the train, the camera focusing on their shoes until they meet, is a brilliant opening that instantly gets your attention.

Everything about Miriamโ€™s murder is brilliantly shot. Thereโ€™s such a great build up to it that really shows how much of a psycho Bruno is, as he pops a childโ€™s balloon and follows Miriam around. He follows her through the amusement park, and then when he finally confronts her the camera is focused on her face as he lights it up with the lighter that will become so important later in the plot. The murder itself is shot through the reflection from the lens of Miriamโ€™s glasses that had been knocked to the floor. Itโ€™s a unique way to show the killing and makes it incredibly memorable.

Like most Hitchcock films, Strangers on a Train is a classic. Itโ€™s stood the test of time and is still brilliant to watch now. Thereโ€™s some great performances and brilliant tension that builds all the way through to a great finale.  

Thanks for reading! If you liked my review, please subscribe to never miss a post:

Posted in film reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment